"This wait-and-see-posture only hurts users and strengthens and further entrenches Big Tech incumbents."
www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...
I realise I'm probably pretty dense but the stansite subscription UX perplexes me.
I hit the subscribe button. I'm not subscribed, but sent to blog landing page and asked to install an app.
(But isn't the idea that I can subscribe to a stansite without installing multiple apps?).../1
LinkedIn is a particular, quite sadistic, version of hell. This happens nowhere else:
"finding out you’ve been let go and then watching the people who made that decision receive public sympathy for it... while you’re still figuring out what to do next."
medium.com/@kakamber07/...
Belgian schools quitting legacy social media for dedicated tools which respect kids' privacy.
And if we gave them a PDS and an app with permissioned data?
www.notele.be/si103-media1...
Mystery solved.
Cookie + Brownie = @brookie.blog, at least if your Belgian.
Getting some of that this morning, thought @brookie.blog should know.
"as social media’s algorithms showed more promoted content and less of the things that people you followed created, the value of the personal connection of Google’s accidental social network became ever more clear"
Well, we won't win the world cup.
But we saved it, and that's something to celebrate.
"we’re really good at “i said” and not yet good at “we agree on”".
This is a seriously interesting #collectiveintelligence question, very worth solving /1
Thinking I may have gone a little OTT on @twinkl.social, and absolutely keeping it that way. #lessisabore
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Atlantic, the jokes continue to write themselves.
Even better it was BlueSky's spam detector, not WSocial's! As @robin.berjon.com mentioned to me earlier today, "the only thing their spam detectors give you is a false sense of security".
The best analyses of where society's heading usually come from those seeking media business models.
This is no exception, tracking as it does "the increasing marriage of extreme wealth, Big Tech, AI and the coalescing American oligarchy which is allied with the political forces of autocracy."
Great thread, particularly if you believe, as I do, that comprehensible FAQs are (almost!) as important as the features themselves.
If a new feature drops in the atmosphere but nobody understands it, did it every actually happen?
I got some clarifications from @anna.wsocial.eu on this point a while back, who confirmed that once an account is created, it can impersonate whomever it likes, of any age.
And of course, the account can be passed to a bot, fwiw. mu.social/profile/math...
Congrats, America! You've just smeared your ugliness all over the beautiful game as you give your players license to break their opponents' legs with impunity.
OTOH nobody will respect your victories from now on, so you lose even if you win.
Nice.
Reply to @mathewlowry.eurosky.social
Reminded me that back in 2023 @peterkaminski.wiki, @band.myatproto.social & I explored canonical blog posts as a solution to the "too many blogs, not enough wikis" problem:
mathewlowry.medium.com/two-wiki-aut...
But how would this look on the Atmosphere?
Reply to @mathewlowry.eurosky.social
... which is pretty funny, given what happened next!
(hope this doesn't happen to you)
mathewlowry.medium.com/all-my-toots...
Did someone mention transition plan?*
mathewlowry.medium.com/x-strategy-o...
* Warning: the logical arguments set out in this framework are not immune to corridor conversations.
Nope, while I was watching England lose to Argentina, you were releasing the basic building block of the future of online collective intelligence. We can, and should, build the European research area with it, augmented with additional curation layers (lab, policy cluster, etc).