Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social
OMG
Roberts: "To “discharg[e] the duties of his trust,” the President
must have the assistance of officers he can trust."
He's literally creating constitutional protection for loyalty tests. Sweet heavens to Murgatroyd
Trump's gonna LOVE this
SCOTUS: Trump can't summarily fire Fed governor Lisa Cook, BUT he essentially has the *constitutional* right to fire other agency heads even if Congress created the agency to be independent and limited now leaders can be fired. A gobsmacking expansion of presidential power.
This is devastating, not only in the majority's analysis that contorts the principles of constitutional interpretation beyond all recognition, but also for the way it strips one of the most vulnerable populations in America of the right to live a full and happy life.
The Supreme Court's 250th anniversary gift to America: turning the principle engraved on the Statue of Liberty itself on its head. We no longer "lift our lamp beside the golden door," at least not to the immigrants Trump disdains. My column: www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/25/o...
Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social
But the fact that the ruling was 6-3ish (more like 5 1/2 to 3 1/2) instead of unanimous (or at least 7-2 because there is no accounting for Thomas and Alito) is really, really abominable.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
Looks like Harlan Crow, billionaire conservative donor and infamous travel buddy of Justice Clarence Thomas, is a White House decorator now…
wapo.st/4wcRII3
This is the man who is refusing to sign an affordable housing bill, calling “a yawn.” www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/u...
Maybe, just maybe, spend some of your party coffers on recruiting, investing in and supporting candidates (women in particular) who aren’t Nazi tattooed and sex crimey
In the short term, at least, this is a boon for the GOP, which has far more in its party coffers than Democrats
Trump won't like this
SCOTUS: Federal election law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day. That means states that count ballots postmarked by Election Day may continue doing so.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
And in the biggest act of "See? We're not that bad!" ever, the Supreme Court holds that children born in the United States, regardless of their parents' citizenship status, are US citizens.
My column on the Supreme Court's coronation of President Trump: www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/29/o...
This is the president to whom the Supreme Court just granted vastly expanded powers
Hey DC: come see my friend @atimaomara.bsky.social and me as we discuss her book The Instigators tomorrow at Politics and Prose at The Wharf: politics-prose.com/atima-omara5...
Nothin says Happy Birthday America like creating massive air pollution over the nation's capital
www.capitalweather.com/dcs-firework...
Justice Brett Kavanaugh is having a real one: He authors opinions of the court denying vulnerable kids the right to play sports and striking down campaign finance rules, and then writes a concurrence/dissent that essentially says the citizenship of babies born in the US is up to Congress to decide.
Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social
Roberts: “What text, history, and structure settle, our precedent confirms—the President may remove his subordinates at will.” 🤴
The demand for cheap fast fashion contributes to tragedies like this. We’ve learned nothing from Rana Plaza.
www.nbcnews.com/world/china/...
Pay her what you owe her
Don’t act like you forgot
Trump betta have her money
www.reuters.com/world/judge-...
Every now and then I fall apart.
What an incredible voice. Rest peacefully
Tomorrow is the last opinion day of the term. Still on deck: birthright citizenship, bans on trans athletes in sports, and whether candidates can coordinate campaign spending with parties. This would be a really good time to sign up for my newsletter the Gavel: www.bostonglobe.com/newsletters/...
Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social
Fast fashion is a human rights and environmental justice issue. apps.bostonglobe.com/opinion/grap...
SCOTUS: Police obtaining geofencing data from cell phones of people in the vicinity of a crime is a search for Fourth Amendment purposes. The court remands to a lower court to decide if the search was a reasonable one or not. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social
Worth noting that this ruling will be popular with just about everyone except Trump and his diehards because just about everyone, Republicans too, like voting by mail.
I've covered the court for the better part of 20 years. I love my job. But, y'all, sometimes it makes me angry and sad. Profoundly, profoundly sad.