favs.blue
  1. 1

    Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social

    OMG

    Roberts: "To “discharg[e] the duties of his trust,” the President
    must have the assistance of officers he can trust."

    He's literally creating constitutional protection for loyalty tests. Sweet heavens to Murgatroyd

    514 143
    Jun 29, 2026
  2. 3

    Trump's gonna LOVE this
    SCOTUS: Trump can't summarily fire Fed governor Lisa Cook, BUT he essentially has the *constitutional* right to fire other agency heads even if Congress created the agency to be independent and limited now leaders can be fired. A gobsmacking expansion of presidential power.

    206 92
    Jun 29, 2026
  3. 4

    Maybe, just maybe, spend some of your party coffers on recruiting, investing in and supporting candidates (women in particular) who aren’t Nazi tattooed and sex crimey

    145 16
    Jul 9, 2026
  4. 5

    Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social

    But the fact that the ruling was 6-3ish (more like 5 1/2 to 3 1/2) instead of unanimous (or at least 7-2 because there is no accounting for Thomas and Alito) is really, really abominable.

    www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

    127 26
    Jun 30, 2026
  5. 6

    Trump won't like this
    SCOTUS: Federal election law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day. That means states that count ballots postmarked by Election Day may continue doing so.
    www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

    120 16
    Jun 29, 2026
  6. 7

    I've covered the court for the better part of 20 years. I love my job. But, y'all, sometimes it makes me angry and sad. Profoundly, profoundly sad.

  7. 9

    We made it to Friday, y’all
    Just barely

  8. 10

    The Supreme Court's 250th anniversary gift to America: turning the principle engraved on the Statue of Liberty itself on its head. We no longer "lift our lamp beside the golden door," at least not to the immigrants Trump disdains. My column: www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/25/o...

    84 38
    Jun 26, 2026
  9. 11

    And in the biggest act of "See? We're not that bad!" ever, the Supreme Court holds that children born in the United States, regardless of their parents' citizenship status, are US citizens.

    69 13
    Jun 30, 2026
  10. 12

    This is the man who is refusing to sign an affordable housing bill, calling “a yawn.” www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/u...

    67 20
    Jul 1, 2026
  11. 15

    Last day of this wild ride of a Supreme Court term

  12. 16

    Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social

    Roberts: “What text, history, and structure settle, our precedent confirms—the President may remove his subordinates at will.” 🤴

    58 10
    Jun 29, 2026
  13. 19

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh is having a real one: He authors opinions of the court denying vulnerable kids the right to play sports and striking down campaign finance rules, and then writes a concurrence/dissent that essentially says the citizenship of babies born in the US is up to Congress to decide.

    51 10
    Jun 30, 2026
  14. 20

    Reply to @kimberlyeatkins.bsky.social

    Worth noting that this ruling will be popular with just about everyone except Trump and his diehards because just about everyone, Republicans too, like voting by mail.