favs.blue
  1. 1

    About Trump v. Barbara: Do not give the Court and the CJ credit for reading and upholding the Constitution. It's a travesty that this is not a unanimous decision... it's also a travesty that the Court let this question percolate for a year, giving credence to a crank theory of citizenship.

    3,153 811
    Jun 30, 2026
  2. 2

    What have we lost? The Fourteenth Amendment is holding on by what is effectively a single vote, and Brett Kavanaugh provided a statutory roadmap for next time (and yes, there will be a next time).

    But, you're right, time to stop bitching!

    561 117
    Jun 30, 2026
  3. 3

    Your weekly reminder to always choose the bear.

    547 69
    Jul 1, 2026
  4. 4

    Reply to @profmmurray.bsky.social

    They could have decided the substantive question a year ago, as the ACLU and plaintiffs requested. Instead, they let it sit and gather steam for a year, while so many people waited breathlessly for them to deign to speak. Do not laud them for getting to the right outcome today.

    299 45
    Jun 30, 2026
  5. 5

    It goes beyond stymieing Yale's independence. It'll pressure others under similar investigations to settle, prompting the most significant development in the higher ed landscape since SFFA v Harvard. Under the admin's logic, the mere presence of minorities is proof of impermissible aff action

    140 37
    Jul 8, 2026
  6. 6

    About WV v. BJP: The Court did not go as far as it could have in rendering trans-people liminal in society. But this Administration will do what it did in SFFA v. Harvard--push the envelope on a narrow decision to eliminate protections for marginalized groups.

    160 36
    Jun 30, 2026
  7. 12

    The yak is living a cyclospora-free life.

  8. 13

    Hopping into the anchor chair to sub for @arimelber.bsky.social on @beatwithari.bsky.social on @msnowreports.bsky.social... join us!

    121 5
    Jul 23, 2026
  9. 15